bus tour vs Vineyard Vacation

Well I guess after a few tense encounters with Real Americans, the Vineyard must be a lot better, certainly the wine is…

There seems to be some conception that taking a vacation on the eve of what many see as the doom of the stock market is somewhat of a problem but I guess when your enjoying the cool crisp pre autum air, that really does not matter much.

 

Have a look at the luxurious Vineyard, never been there not sure they would even let us in there, I wonder how many people would even be allowed to get in there.

US credit rating

If someone were intentionally trying to destroy the credit rating of the US government, then would that not be an act of treason?

Would it not be a severe issue that needed to be solved?

The US credit rating could be downgraded on Monday or later in the week amid speculation that Washington does not know what it is doing, and should that not be the case?  If anyone even a country keeps borrowing money without paying it back and then later printing money and not paying the money back, and later lowering interests and not paying the money back eventually the end result is financial ruin.

Any economist will tell you that this is the truth yet, for some unknown reason Washington does not or refuses to know this truth, and what can we expect if this is the way that they intend to do business?

The only way out of this mess, is two things.

Flat tax, ballanced budget, equals, another four years, for the democrats, if they keep on doing what they are doing now then the republicians wil win and the democrats will be run out of town on a rail.

So here is the deal, if we raise the debt limit, (print more money) then our credit rating will go down.

If we dont raise the debt limit our credit goes down.

If we lower our costs and set a flat tax our credit rating goes up.

It really is just that simple.

Most Americans understand this and most economists also understand this so why does the white house not understand this?

Received in an email, from Michele Bachmann

As the debate over the debt ceiling gains heat and President Obama stands firmly atop his bully pulpit, his stubborn insistence on drowning our nation in debt has caught the attention of the American people.

A new Gallup poll released this week shows him losing by eight points to a Republican, a larger margin than ever before.

With only one out of five supporting raising the debt ceiling, the American people know what should be common-sense to Congress and the President–when you’re in a hole, the first step to getting out is to stop digging.

To the majority of Americans that do not support it, raising the debt ceiling means much more than just continuing to dig.

It means placing trillions more in unfunded liabilities on the shoulders of future generations. It means abandoning the very principles that we in Congress were elected to represent.

In my three terms in Congress, I have never voted to raise the debt ceiling, and I will certainly not start now.

Yesterday, at a press conference, President Obama ignored these vital points, stating that we only need “minor adjustments” to fix our economy. At a time of trillion-and-a-half-dollar annual deficits and 9.2 percent unemployment, he could not be more out of touch.

Constitutional conservatives know that, in order for our nation to truly prosper, we need systemic reform–not band-aids. This reflects a core difference of philosophy that will be at the forefront of the 2012 elections.

The consistency and dedication that our movement has shown to stopping the hemmoraging of our future reflects the stakes that face our nation in 2012. The Obama machine will spend record dollars to overcome the opposition of the American people to his policies and win re-election, and we must work harder than ever to ensure that our constitutional conservative values are victorious. In this challenge, I couldn’t be more grateful that you are with me. Michele Bachmann

Bill Hemmer liberal bias?

Is Bill Hemmer a liberally biased bobble head?

Liberal Bias is it reporting or is it political nonsense.

Update, again today, on Tue the 26th allegedly Bill Hemmer, showed his true colors by not challenging an obviously flawed commentary made by an alleged spin consultant, but what is the aim of Bill Hemmer, is he really as liberal as he seems to be?  Who knows for sure, because sometimes it seems as if fox news is run by alleged idiots.

Could be, this morning on national TV, he had a man who allegedly lied, and not by just a little this man lied by a hundred yards or more, yet, Bill let it ride, he did not challenge the mans alleged lie at all?

What kind of reporting is that anyway?

Fair and Balanced?

The topic was about the Budget deal, facts were not represented, facts that should have been discussed were not, what they did discuss was based on conjecture, bias and skull skullduggery, yes, Bill did nothing there was no fair and balanced discussion on this topic at all, so the question comes up is this news?

Is this a news company or a tabloid?

Certainly you have seen and heard in the news about the most recent scandals concerning the parent company of Fox news, when you see these types of things come up you have to wonder what is going on, who is running this company?

Because in the past there was real discussion and not just one side of a poorly thought out interview.

Plainly there is a problem in Fox news and it is hoped that someone in that organization can find a method of developing the right kind of answer, simply because one side of a discussion is not news, certainly not when the company in question claims to be fair and balanced.

So what exactly was wrong with this discussion and the alleged bias presented by the “former” CBO official on Fox news?

Simple, he stated, that the plan presented by the Republicans has no real cuts, so no real savings could be obtained, however he failed to compare apples with apples, because the liberal point of view claims that they can save money through reducing fraud, a great thing my fiends for sure, but apparently only liberals can claim to be able to reduce fraud because no mention was made to this fact, that if fraud can be uncovered by democrats, then certainly it can be uncovered by Republicans, so again, fox news did it self no favor, Bill hemmer, stared at the TV camera, and made no method of argument against this flawed view point.

It is amazing that anyone would even believe this kind of trash presented on TV…

So, the prescription drug benefit, is a problem for our budget, but we have no problem with spending millions of dollars, for Art, work that is not really ART, we have no problems spending money for protecting Rats, in a Swamp, (allegedly) in Nancy Ps, district. We have no problem in Billions in government waste and fraud.

Yet, the only thing the liberals have to talk about is to try and scare seniors?

Really? 

That is your entire deal?

I was really surprised that bill hemmer made no effort to do anything to question all this questionable material, it was a surprise, because the guy looks smart enough but is he really, where did Bill hemmer come from anyway?

CNN, ops, yes, perhaps Bill is not as fair and balanced as he should be and perhaps bill hemmer should consider that the next time he allows a man to allegedly come on national TV and lie it is not a good thing…

 

Obama to blame?

Is President Obama to blame for the problems

that we have, well according to this email he is,

and they say that he has threatened

to veto a bill that might put Americans back to work, but is that really true?

It seems like we have a problem and that for some reason the liberals are not working with anyone, how could that be?

Received in an email…

Dear Patriot,
 
With time running out on the debt ceiling deadline, leaders in Congress are moving closer to the framework of a deal that would cut spending by trillions of dollars without raising taxes. While it has yet to be proven that the cuts are real and substantive, rather than just gimmicks, this is the kind of deal that could put this country on track to balance the budget and restore confidence in the markets.
 
There are even reports that Boehner, McConnell and Reid took a deal to the President, who flatly said he would veto it because it did not raise taxes.

Even the despicable (allegedly) Harry Reid has given up on these dangerous games, but Barack Obama is attempting to further damage the economy by raising taxes in an attempt to force Conservatives to say uncle, but is there a chance that we could raise more revenue by having a fair tax, or a flat tax?
 
We won’t stand for this! Please, help us tell Barack Obama that we cannot afford to raise taxes during a struggling economy! You can support our fight to shrink the size of government and restore fiscal sanity by making a donation –HERE–
 
Sincerely,

Bryan Shroyer
Executive Director, Western Representation PAC

978

Will you some day soon find that your child may be charged with a felony for watching a video on youtube.com?

That could happen if we do not call our senators and congressman on this issue, it is a horrible bill and you should really have a long look at the senators that have sponsored this madness and insanity.

Should Senators be doing this kind of thing or should Americans who have experience with the "right" kind of legal experience. 

When you do not "think" about a law unintended consequences can be a huge issue, so in reality, why do we have these ignorant bills that perhaps are written by allegedly, "special interests"

Who wrote this bill?

The music industry?

The movie industry?

The video below this text would be a crime under this new proposed law, freedom of Speech might be taken away…

Is this what we need to be concerned with in our nation or do we have other problems?

It would seem that America has more serious problems, than to try to do an end run around the constitution allegedly using senators that perhaps might need to be voted out of office. 

The Death of common sense, when will these so called representatives of the American people wake up?

We cannot allow this kind of poorly written bill to become law.

This video might be a crime if this law were passed in its present wording.

floods create diasters

There are a lot of serious natural and some sadly man made flooding disasters that are happening in different parts of the US right now however many of the news companies are not covering these stories or they are not covering them very well at all.

It is really a serious problem, in regard to how the media is choosing to cover the news, you see advertisments for gold and all kinds of things like that but not very much as far as real news.

Media makes fun of Christian Beliefs?

Why is it that the media feels like they can make fun of the religious beliefs of Millions of people all over the world?

We do understand that the gentleman was an elderly man who likely was not able to accurately speak for himself however we know that this was true, did the media not know it as well or are they not as smart as they think they are?

Over the last few days you may have seen a misguided elderly man who is 89 years old and has already in the past made a failed prediction that the rapture would take place in the past, he was wrong, yet the media made a big deal out of this and caused a lot of consternation.

I wonder if it had been any other religion would they have been so quick to make fun of an old many who allegedly is senile…

Ask yourself why the media did this and to what end they engaged in this behavior?

Warning this video may be offensive to some people…
do not watch if you are easily offended or are senile.

The rapture

Well in case you have not been watching the news today and several hundred billboards and posters all over the place, then you know that a prediction made by a 89 year old elderly man who you could easily say allegedly was a little senile, but the real story here is not the end of days or the rapture, but it is how the media makes a big deal out of one elderly dementia patient, (allegedly) and then proceeds to generalize the statements and predictions made by this man as if all Christians were a part of this belief systems.

The Media are Liars right, sure and that is not allegedly that is a fact.

The problem here is the double standard here that exists in the media, if there were about some other religions beliefs then this story would not have even received a moments notice, and you have to ask why is that?

The answer is simple if someone made fun of other religions, it would be that they were not tolerant.

If someone made snide remarks about another religions common beliefs they would be seen as hate speech.

But when it comes to Christians, apparently it is ok to make fun of them and to make remarks, but in the end, not matter what you believe, know this, it is just one man, this man does not represent the Christian movement at all, yet the media has done nothing to separate that fact from all the fiction that has been spewed all over the TV and the Internet.

It really makes no sense at all that the media would participate in this kind of gross negligence, (allegedly)

Warning this video is disturbing and might be offensive to some people, view at your own risk.

Arnold, and the end of days movie.

With the prediction of the end of days, being the result of an elderly man who allegedly is likely senile, much of the media is contending in ways that would seem to be hostile to all Christians, which is sort of disappointing.

Really I guess with everything that is going on in the world when you have a story about Arnold being the biggest story, you must be joking right, we have historic flooding that could be a 120 year flood and the big media news story is Arnold, really that is really funny, I could care less.

I like Arnold, and if anyone is really surprised that a man had a hard time being one of the most successful Actors of his generation, really that is just funny.

So what is next will we start taking about how Tiger Woods is the big news story of the day…

What next is the great news story going to be about bozo the clown?

 

 

Whoppi Race Card?

Well you just never know or do you, the idea is that everyone is a racist but in politics people are bound to disagree, is that not just part of what it means to be human, it is not always about race.

So why is it so easy to do this?

Please note opinions expressed here may not necessarily be representative,
of the owners or Blue Mountain Entertainment, Until the day comes when free speech is no longer free
we will allow guest posters the liberty to express their own thoughts.