US credit rating

If someone were intentionally trying to destroy the credit rating of the US government, then would that not be an act of treason?

Would it not be a severe issue that needed to be solved?

The US credit rating could be downgraded on Monday or later in the week amid speculation that Washington does not know what it is doing, and should that not be the case?  If anyone even a country keeps borrowing money without paying it back and then later printing money and not paying the money back, and later lowering interests and not paying the money back eventually the end result is financial ruin.

Any economist will tell you that this is the truth yet, for some unknown reason Washington does not or refuses to know this truth, and what can we expect if this is the way that they intend to do business?

The only way out of this mess, is two things.

Flat tax, ballanced budget, equals, another four years, for the democrats, if they keep on doing what they are doing now then the republicians wil win and the democrats will be run out of town on a rail.

So here is the deal, if we raise the debt limit, (print more money) then our credit rating will go down.

If we dont raise the debt limit our credit goes down.

If we lower our costs and set a flat tax our credit rating goes up.

It really is just that simple.

Most Americans understand this and most economists also understand this so why does the white house not understand this?

Received in an email, from Michele Bachmann

As the debate over the debt ceiling gains heat and President Obama stands firmly atop his bully pulpit, his stubborn insistence on drowning our nation in debt has caught the attention of the American people.

A new Gallup poll released this week shows him losing by eight points to a Republican, a larger margin than ever before.

With only one out of five supporting raising the debt ceiling, the American people know what should be common-sense to Congress and the President–when you’re in a hole, the first step to getting out is to stop digging.

To the majority of Americans that do not support it, raising the debt ceiling means much more than just continuing to dig.

It means placing trillions more in unfunded liabilities on the shoulders of future generations. It means abandoning the very principles that we in Congress were elected to represent.

In my three terms in Congress, I have never voted to raise the debt ceiling, and I will certainly not start now.

Yesterday, at a press conference, President Obama ignored these vital points, stating that we only need “minor adjustments” to fix our economy. At a time of trillion-and-a-half-dollar annual deficits and 9.2 percent unemployment, he could not be more out of touch.

Constitutional conservatives know that, in order for our nation to truly prosper, we need systemic reform–not band-aids. This reflects a core difference of philosophy that will be at the forefront of the 2012 elections.

The consistency and dedication that our movement has shown to stopping the hemmoraging of our future reflects the stakes that face our nation in 2012. The Obama machine will spend record dollars to overcome the opposition of the American people to his policies and win re-election, and we must work harder than ever to ensure that our constitutional conservative values are victorious. In this challenge, I couldn’t be more grateful that you are with me. Michele Bachmann


Bill Hemmer liberal bias?

Is Bill Hemmer a liberally biased bobble head?

Liberal Bias is it reporting or is it political nonsense.

Update, again today, on Tue the 26th allegedly Bill Hemmer, showed his true colors by not challenging an obviously flawed commentary made by an alleged spin consultant, but what is the aim of Bill Hemmer, is he really as liberal as he seems to be?  Who knows for sure, because sometimes it seems as if fox news is run by alleged idiots.

Could be, this morning on national TV, he had a man who allegedly lied, and not by just a little this man lied by a hundred yards or more, yet, Bill let it ride, he did not challenge the mans alleged lie at all?

What kind of reporting is that anyway?

Fair and Balanced?

The topic was about the Budget deal, facts were not represented, facts that should have been discussed were not, what they did discuss was based on conjecture, bias and skull skullduggery, yes, Bill did nothing there was no fair and balanced discussion on this topic at all, so the question comes up is this news?

Is this a news company or a tabloid?

Certainly you have seen and heard in the news about the most recent scandals concerning the parent company of Fox news, when you see these types of things come up you have to wonder what is going on, who is running this company?

Because in the past there was real discussion and not just one side of a poorly thought out interview.

Plainly there is a problem in Fox news and it is hoped that someone in that organization can find a method of developing the right kind of answer, simply because one side of a discussion is not news, certainly not when the company in question claims to be fair and balanced.

So what exactly was wrong with this discussion and the alleged bias presented by the “former” CBO official on Fox news?

Simple, he stated, that the plan presented by the Republicans has no real cuts, so no real savings could be obtained, however he failed to compare apples with apples, because the liberal point of view claims that they can save money through reducing fraud, a great thing my fiends for sure, but apparently only liberals can claim to be able to reduce fraud because no mention was made to this fact, that if fraud can be uncovered by democrats, then certainly it can be uncovered by Republicans, so again, fox news did it self no favor, Bill hemmer, stared at the TV camera, and made no method of argument against this flawed view point.

It is amazing that anyone would even believe this kind of trash presented on TV…

So, the prescription drug benefit, is a problem for our budget, but we have no problem with spending millions of dollars, for Art, work that is not really ART, we have no problems spending money for protecting Rats, in a Swamp, (allegedly) in Nancy Ps, district. We have no problem in Billions in government waste and fraud.

Yet, the only thing the liberals have to talk about is to try and scare seniors?

Really? 

That is your entire deal?

I was really surprised that bill hemmer made no effort to do anything to question all this questionable material, it was a surprise, because the guy looks smart enough but is he really, where did Bill hemmer come from anyway?

CNN, ops, yes, perhaps Bill is not as fair and balanced as he should be and perhaps bill hemmer should consider that the next time he allows a man to allegedly come on national TV and lie it is not a good thing…

 


Obama to blame?

Is President Obama to blame for the problems

that we have, well according to this email he is,

and they say that he has threatened

to veto a bill that might put Americans back to work, but is that really true?

It seems like we have a problem and that for some reason the liberals are not working with anyone, how could that be?

Received in an email…

Dear Patriot,
 
With time running out on the debt ceiling deadline, leaders in Congress are moving closer to the framework of a deal that would cut spending by trillions of dollars without raising taxes. While it has yet to be proven that the cuts are real and substantive, rather than just gimmicks, this is the kind of deal that could put this country on track to balance the budget and restore confidence in the markets.
 
There are even reports that Boehner, McConnell and Reid took a deal to the President, who flatly said he would veto it because it did not raise taxes.

Even the despicable (allegedly) Harry Reid has given up on these dangerous games, but Barack Obama is attempting to further damage the economy by raising taxes in an attempt to force Conservatives to say uncle, but is there a chance that we could raise more revenue by having a fair tax, or a flat tax?
 
We won’t stand for this! Please, help us tell Barack Obama that we cannot afford to raise taxes during a struggling economy! You can support our fight to shrink the size of government and restore fiscal sanity by making a donation –HERE–
 
Sincerely,

Bryan Shroyer
Executive Director, Western Representation PAC


floods create diasters

There are a lot of serious natural and some sadly man made flooding disasters that are happening in different parts of the US right now however many of the news companies are not covering these stories or they are not covering them very well at all.

It is really a serious problem, in regard to how the media is choosing to cover the news, you see advertisments for gold and all kinds of things like that but not very much as far as real news.


Arnold, and the end of days movie.

With the prediction of the end of days, being the result of an elderly man who allegedly is likely senile, much of the media is contending in ways that would seem to be hostile to all Christians, which is sort of disappointing.

Really I guess with everything that is going on in the world when you have a story about Arnold being the biggest story, you must be joking right, we have historic flooding that could be a 120 year flood and the big media news story is Arnold, really that is really funny, I could care less.

I like Arnold, and if anyone is really surprised that a man had a hard time being one of the most successful Actors of his generation, really that is just funny.

So what is next will we start taking about how Tiger Woods is the big news story of the day…

What next is the great news story going to be about bozo the clown?

 

 


Whoppi Race Card?

Well you just never know or do you, the idea is that everyone is a racist but in politics people are bound to disagree, is that not just part of what it means to be human, it is not always about race.

So why is it so easy to do this?


Fox news gets it wrong?

Is Fox news a problem or are they just biased like all the others so called Journalistic media of the future?

The question is a valid one, is it fair and balanced or is it just a particular viewpoint?

I suppose if not for Fox news there would be no real news at all (allegedly)

But where does the blame lie for these sins of omission?

Production?

Planning?

Direction?

So which is it, are the employment numbers up or down, or sideways?

Do people really want to look up a girls skirt on national TV, (Can I say the answer is NO)

People, this HD is a great thing for movies, but I do not want to look up a womans skirt on national TV in the morning before 9 AM.

In a morning story on fox and friends they reported that there were 403 thousand new claims for un-employment and that it was higher than expected, (there is someone out there expecting more loss of jobs) think about that for a moment, today there are 403,000 more people out of work now that is just not good news in any way shape or form.

Then just a few minutes ago we get this email from Fox business news.

The Labor Department reports initial jobless claims fell last week by a less-than-expected 13,000 to 403,000.

Ok can you see why People just do not take the media seriously?

Two different shows on the Fox network report differently on the same news story and neither one got it right.

Yes, I know it is hard to believe, two different view points, and they both got the story wrong, or perhaps it was intentional?

I just have to ask, what is up at fox news, are the producers allegedly incompetent?

In so many ways the real story here is that two years after the stimulus plan, and TARP, and Billions of allegedly Missing Money, (some say as much as 230 Billion dollars is missing) that we have 403 thousand new first time claims, ok get that people, it is not good news, at all it is very bad news.

What is really interesting about this story is the apparent lack of faith in the public’s ability to think for themselves.

Apparently Fox news has joined the ranks of its Fellows that tend to think that every one but the producers and owners of Fox news are just plain too stupid to see through all the bull pucky they are shoveling.

I heard this blond, come on national TV and say perhaps its not as bad as everyone thinks it is?

Excuse me, but little miss Barbie pants, but do you have any idea what it is like in the real world?

When was the last time you drove yourself to work, in fact when was the last time you even had to put gas into a car, probably a long time ago, because you likely don’t even have a car.

This is the kind of stuff that drives viewers crazy, and while we are at it, I know many people might want to see a scantily clad blond is a skirt that is far too short for TV audiences, but I suspect that at least half the audience does not approve of the short short far too revealing camera shots at Fox news in the morning.

Just in case you producers do not realize it in HD there are times when you just dont want to see up a womans skirt.

My God people get it together.

 

 

 


Washington wont honor budget deal?

Reports are coming in this morning that the Obama White house will not be honoring the Budget deal with congress.

Which some say is no surprise, however, it is concerning that when men come together and shake hands and write on paper what they will do then later they decide that they will not abide by those terms, what kind of message does that send to the world?

It is not something that is what we would expect from a Harvard Educated man.

In many ways, we have observed many of these types of small issues that are of concern to voting Americans.

What is happening in Washington is a serious problem for liberal democrats that are hoping to use the media to create enough votes to reelect their candidate the problem is that so many of these issues keep coming up.

Everyone knows that if they buy a car and do not honor the contract between the car dealership, that someone is going to come and take that car away from you, no doubt about it, yet for some reason some of the radical liberals in Washington think that they are somehow better than any one else in the US.