If they are what are they lying about?

Can you trust the media any more?

Chris Matthews, today yet again showed how liberal he is, when he allowed comments on the show he was hosting that were unprofessional, biased, and in some instances lies.

You have to wonder, about this kind of thing, because when you look at the truth often you see something you never saw before.  Consider this, today or was it yesterday, oh well no matter, apparently Washington these days has forgotton how to add subtract multiply and divide, call it basic math.

They put out a news story about how many new jobs that were created, (I guess they are done with saving them)

The real problem is that when you do not add up the totals correctly you can get a bad mathematical result.

I must really ask Chris Wallace sometime, does he think were all stupid…

When you conveniently forget to add up all the returning Military members that are likely standing in an un-employment line somewhere in the USA, that number that was touted as the beginning of a recovery, well it would not be a positive number, its really amazing when you think about how stupid people like this really are.

I have to ask, is this man stupid?

Or did he just not learn how to count when he went to school?

It is a valid question, and what about the millions of Americans that have not been counted as being unemployed.

Would the real numbers, be 14.2 percent, instead of the lie that they told about 8.6 percent or some such Bull puky.

When you cannot report the news you are lying to yourself and your viewing audience that is a shame on the profession and a shame on the  network.

The truth cannot be changed by a lie, it cannot be contained, it will not sit and hide from the light of day…

Think about that for a moment, The media has been presenting only one part of the story, only one perspective, even Fox news which has become one of the more popular media outlets, is sliding over to one view, they say that they are fair and ballanced, but are they really?  Bill hemmer, Bill, orielly, Shepard Smith,  all tend to present Bias in their coverage, they want you to believe that they are presenting news and facts, but is that really accurate?

Bill orielly, says the spin stops here, but when he engages in favoring one side over another, when he only covers one side of an issue and talks over anyone Else’s opinion, then is that not his own “spin” I find it hard to swallow that Bill is not having some kind of mental issue, (allegedly) but I guess that is to be expected as he has a history of this in his family, and that is to be expected, however there is a thin line between reality and fantasy, and Bill sometimes I think gets lost in that thin line.

This was just received in an email and it is compelling, the Media is against the tea party, but why is that?

Dear Patriot,

Something incredible has been happening over the last few days, and it was every loyal member of the Tea Party Movement that made it happen! If you’ve been following the news, you’ve heard nearly every political commentator comment on the fact that Speaker John Boehner was forced to change his original plan twice because he couldn’t muster the 216 votes to get it passed. The general commentary goes like this: “In the past, Speaker Boehner could have given away money for a bridge or a library to buy the votes he needed, but the Tea Party banned earmarks so he doesn’t have that luxury.” Many of these old media dinosaurs speak with disdain when they make this point, as though by stripping the Congress of their currency of corruption (earmarks) is a bad thing; they just don’t get it! You should feel extremely proud of what those of us in the Tea Party have done–we have changed the entire culture inside Congress!

Now, if a politician wants to get the votes to pass legislation, he better be able to win on the merits of that legislation. It’s no longer an option to trade an unprincipled vote to fund some absurd pet project. No more “cornhusker kickbacks” for Ben Nelson in Nebraska; no more “Louisiana purchase” for Mary Landrieu in exchange for the passage of the dangerous Obamacare. This is the first example of how we are going to stop the flow of terrible legislation from Washington.

I’m so proud to have played my small role, and I’m genuinely hopeful that as we continue to grow, “We The People” will be able to preserve the blessings of liberty for our children and grandchildren! The fight over the debt ceiling continues but already we’ve secured important victories by changing the process. This organization will continue to recruit tens of thousands of new patriots each and every week, and we’ll continue to provide the latest and best tools to make all of us more effective activists. TOGETHER, WE WILL WIN!

The most incredible part is we have put all of this infrastructure together without having to sell our souls to anyone. We’re entirely funded by patriots just like you who make an average contribution of less than $60! This truly is a historic day for the direction of country and we remain humbled by your continued support.
 
Thank you,
Dustin Stockton
Media Director

Are all unions like this?

The answer is No, most unions are for the people they are good folks, that cook out just like you do they go to work just like you do and they socialize just like you do, most of the unions are really not this bad, but there are some apparently that are giving a lot of other decent unions a bad name.

In Wisconsin the Unions allegedly took Millions of dollars in members Dues, and paid for lots of different types of alleged advertising for a liberal judge, (sort of like a semi legal from of buying off a judge) wait that just does not sound right, is it possible that this Rogue union has attempted to put in power a paid for judge, (allegedly)

Now is this wrong?  You know that is a really good thought…

When Union members pay dues, they expect that the leaders will use those dues to enhance the Union members lives, both at work and at home, they expect to see some benefit, this type of use of dues for political reasons I think should not be legal in Wisconsin.

Dues should go to benefit the membership and in fact is that not what the bylaws state?

There are a lot of questionable things going on in Wisconsin and it is time that Unions respected the rule of law just like everyone else does in these United States of America.  Just imagine how many “Union Families” could benefit by having a scholarship to help hard working Members families send their children to College…

Is that not what this money should be used for?  To benefit the membership as a whole or at least to benefit those that produce excellence in learning, something, even a cook out would be better than spending millions of a political race it just does not seem like the American way of life.

Is this Right and should this be happening?

The following news story may tell a tale that should cause many Americans to be very concerned about what is going on in Wisconsin, when a “Rogue” union, attempts to supplant the will of the people with its own agenda, When an alleged, lonely isolated, liberal Rogue union attempts to oppress the will of the voters and overturn a government is this not a matter for the Justice department?

You might wonder just what that man up there in Washington is really doing, Golf anyone, (allegedly nothing else is going on up there) The thing is this we have an organized labor union that is taking money from their members to attempt to force an election to turn out in their favor, this is not only wrong but it is illegal and should be stopped.

They may not realize it but it is time for some election reform in Wisconsin and guess who is in charge.

It is time to put things right in Wisconsin.

This is the time to figure out what the deal is…

Time to figure out who is telling the truth and who is a liar…

If this is not the hope and change you voted for it is time to vote them all out of office.

Or is it due to faulty reporting by so called fair and balanced reporters?

So what is up with the lack of coverage on this topic?

Why is the Media not covering this news story, is it not news that we have faced government shut down before and magically the world did not end? Why is the media not covering this news story and what does that say about a news company that will not cover the news are they really a news company or are they an entertainment company instead.

For some reason which 93 percent of the population cannot understand, liberals behave in a different manner than ordinary citizens, we do not understand how anyone could play games with the tragic events that occurred in Arizona, it seems heartless and soulless to do such things when 93 percent of the world are concerned for those that feel the pain and sorrow of sudden loss. I do not pretend to know, why this may be true but I do know the pain and sorrow of sudden loss. It is like a black cloud that descends upon your life and every aspect of your life becomes a Grey place, food tastes like cardboard, suddenly even the TV shows you used to watch seem like blaring reminders of when life was ordinary and happy.

So I thank God that I know most of those that are suffering today and will continue to suffer, will not hear any of the gutter snipping comments of the liberal media and lets face it that is what most of them are, Yes, even Fox news, is liberal at times, part of their fair and balanced, thing.

Ordinary citizens that have lives out side of the Television, will probably just turn the TV off when they break into a news program with that “Breaking news” thing, some neighbor of someone else who knew the boy, tells another story of how they knew something was wrong but did nothing about it.

I know, it is a little harsh, but it is what we are seeing, on the Air, when people make up excuses for the actions of this communist loving, Fascist, (allegedly)
It makes me sick, but apparently the liberals at the large and small networks seem to think that blaming popular people like sarah palin will change something when in reality all it does is make the liberals look stupid.

Yes, it makes them look bad, when they do this, no one believes that when you do something you are not held responsible for it, yet the liberals would have us believe that Sarah Palin is responsible and that Rush Limbaugh is responsible, or Shawn Hanity, but never Allan Colmes.

No, Liberals just do not get it, the more they play the blame game the more it will back fire on them.

I know that Liberals do not get it, because they are still trying to blame blame blame, they think that just because people hear it enough they will eventually believe, it, that is allegedly what they believe.

So yes, I know that liberals just do not understand the 93 percent of the nation that feels the sorrow of loss over the political game playing and even believe it or not, fund raising, that is going on before those that lost their lives are even laid to rest.

It is a sad thing, but I take comfort in knowing that people will just turn the channel, watch some other network, or even the cooking channel anything but the hate and reckless finger pointing of the liberals.

Just turn the channel and leave those jerks to their seven percent audience.

What happened this Saturday was a tragedy but it could have been prevented had they only had a minimal security detail.

That is the real story here one that likely you will not see on the news but you can see it here.

The truth is that Gun Bans would not have prevented this terrible tragedy.

A security detail would have reduced and likely have prevented this from happening.

Gun Bans have not worked anywhere ever, because it is not guns that kill people but people that kill people, even if you could some how take away every gun everywhere, people would pickup rocks and sticks and still you could not stop it.

Insanity is the idea that you can keep doing the same thing over and over again and get a different result, it has been tried already and it has failed, we have the right to keep and bear arms and that is not going to change just because a few liberals want to take advantage of a tragedy like this they should be ashamed of what they are trying to do.

Join the NRA and support the right to keep and bear arms, otherwise only criminals will have guns.

The UK with all their restrictions still can not prevent a lunatic from killing people?

Consider this.

Published: 6/4/10, 12:46 PM EDT
By JILL LAWLESS
LONDON (AP) – A taxi driver killed 10 victims in a single hour during a shooting rampage in rural England in which he murdered 12 people and wounded 11 others, police said Friday.

Craig Mackey, chief of police for the county of Cumbria, said Derrick Bird murdered his twin brother and a family lawyer “before departing on a 45-mile rampage across west Cumbria.” He shot a fellow cabbie at a taxi stand and then drove through the countryside in his cab, blasting victims seemingly at random. Many were shot in the face.

Police said the 52-year-old, who committed suicide after the attacks, used his knowledge of the area’s narrow country roads to elude police.

“Twelve innocent people – mother, fathers, partners and friends _were brutally murdered as they went about their daily lives,” Mackey said. He said investigations had found that Bird killed 10 of his victims in about 60 minutes on Wednesday.

Billions in Wasted money…

Millions of jobs lost forever.

Ban on Oil Drilling equals price of gas going up and up and up.

This is the change you voted for or is this something else?

In 2008 everyone had hope for a better future for America.

Now its 2 years later, how do you feel about how things have gone?

Are you better off now?