Join the NRA or only criminals will have guns.

One year after gun-owners were forced to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed, including semi-automatic .22 rifles and shotguns, a program costing the government over 500 million dollars, the results are in…

A dramatic increase in criminal activity has been experienced.
Gun control advocates respond “Just wait… we’ll be safer… you’ll see…”.

OBSERVABLE FACT, AFTER 12 MONTHS OF DATA:

* Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2%
* Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6%
* Australia-wide, armed-robberies are up 44% (yes, FORTY-FOUR PERCENT)
* In the state of Victoria, homicides-with-firearms are up 300%
* Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in homicides-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
* Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed-robbery-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
* There has been a dramatic increase in breakins-and-assaults-of- the-elderly
* At the time of the ban, the Prime Minister said “self-defense is not a reason for owning a firearm”
* From 1910 to present, homicides in Australia had averaged about 1.8-per-100,000 or lower, a safe society by any standard.
* The ban has destroyed Australia’s standings in some international sport shooting competitions
* The membership of the Australian Sports Shooting Association has risen to 112,000, a 200% increase, in response to the ban and as an attempt to organize against further controls, which are expected.
* Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in “safety” has been observed after such monumental effort and expense was successfully expended in “ridding society of guns”. Their response has been to “wait longer”.

“…The best organization you’ve got there, the biggest organization you’ve got there is the NRA. We don’t have an organization that size. We didn’t have an organization that size, and as a consequence, we suffered. And we hope that you don’t suffer…”


Karl Rove was wrong?

What was Karl really wrong about that candidate well apparently in a news story over at politicsdaily.com there is a suggestion that witch craft is involved, now we dont really know and the thing that Karl needs to understand here is that we dont really care either.

This thing between him and O’donnell is personal, it is a personality problem, I think allegedly that this is probably why Karl is no longer active in the political world, sure he is a commentator but it is not the same as it once was, he does not like to be wrong.

You see this with very strong minded people and very intelligent people too.

They get this idea that they are never wrong because of they are too smart to be wrong about anything, but in this case Karl is allegedly wrong and needs to make amends before this destroys his reputation.

I have a really tough time taking him seriously when we start bringing up witch craft it is just not savory and before this I thought it was beyond him.

Apparently I was wrong, what a strange situation to find yourself in and you know what else, anyone that has ever touched a ouija board, is probably just as bad.

I dont care how badly Karl tries to smear this candidate what I do care about is why Karl is so invested in this course of action, this is his white whale.


Now this is the real liberal agenda

You know this is just amazing, this is how these people act when they don’t know other people are listening, you see this is what is wrong with liberals, watch it if you dare, it is just what they are, (allegedly) they eat their own, they are allegedly cannibals.

This could not have happened to a nicer person, than couric, because she deserved it, allegedly, this is what she is like when the lights are on.

After watching the interview that she did and knowing how lame she allegedly was, I really thought it was poor mouthing what she did, (allegedly)