Palin is right

Will the liberal media never cease to pervert the truth with lies?

We ask this question because of all the hate filled speech that some liberal networks and newspapers have engaged in over the last few days.

It is the most perverse thing I have ever seen, finger pointing, blame, in complete political nonsense, the sad thing is that there are some people who really believe it, only a very small number yes, but it only takes one as far as the liberal media is concerned.

Apparently people are no longer responsible for the things they do, Why is it that when liberals make excuses for criminals they are always on the left of the political divide?

The idea that everyone but the person that allegedly did this crime is responsible for his murderous rampage, if that is true then blame the parents, blame the school that allegedly banned him from the campus because they thought he was dangerous.

Why not blame, the sheriff, who had the opportunity to take action but did nothing.

Blame is not the solution, it is the problem.


Join the NRA or only criminals will have guns.

One year after gun-owners were forced to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed, including semi-automatic .22 rifles and shotguns, a program costing the government over 500 million dollars, the results are in…

A dramatic increase in criminal activity has been experienced.
Gun control advocates respond “Just wait… we’ll be safer… you’ll see…”.

OBSERVABLE FACT, AFTER 12 MONTHS OF DATA:

* Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2%
* Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6%
* Australia-wide, armed-robberies are up 44% (yes, FORTY-FOUR PERCENT)
* In the state of Victoria, homicides-with-firearms are up 300%
* Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in homicides-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
* Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed-robbery-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
* There has been a dramatic increase in breakins-and-assaults-of- the-elderly
* At the time of the ban, the Prime Minister said “self-defense is not a reason for owning a firearm”
* From 1910 to present, homicides in Australia had averaged about 1.8-per-100,000 or lower, a safe society by any standard.
* The ban has destroyed Australia’s standings in some international sport shooting competitions
* The membership of the Australian Sports Shooting Association has risen to 112,000, a 200% increase, in response to the ban and as an attempt to organize against further controls, which are expected.
* Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in “safety” has been observed after such monumental effort and expense was successfully expended in “ridding society of guns”. Their response has been to “wait longer”.

“…The best organization you’ve got there, the biggest organization you’ve got there is the NRA. We don’t have an organization that size. We didn’t have an organization that size, and as a consequence, we suffered. And we hope that you don’t suffer…”


Biased media

Is being Biased sort of like lying?

why is the media so biased? I mean, you look at some of this coverage, and you have to wonder what world they are living in because it is not this one.

They live in some other world. But not this one…

You look at some of the news these days, and it has become so obvious that you have to wonder if they are mentally ill.

You might wonder about someone like that, because you see so many news stories that seem to be lies, out right lies.


NPR biased?

What is going on when a publicly funded organization engages in this kind of alleged behavior…

You know if this is accurate, and we say allegedly it might be…

Why are tax dollars being spent to support one party over another, why is one view point made so biased over another,

Why are Americans paying taxes to support this organization when they are so biased, should they not be more balanced.

Are they Biased, it would seem allegedly so…

From this source, online, Fair.org

So if we examine this article, here the source of which can be found here.

“Liberal bias?

That NPR harbors a liberal bias is an article of faith among many conservatives. Spanning from the early ’70s, when President Richard Nixon demanded that “all funds for public broadcasting be cut” (9/23/71), through House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s similar threats in the mid-’90s, the notion that NPR leans left still endures.”

read the entire article here, it is an eye opener, and it also seems to be one of the reasons that NPR seems to be struggling, to pick up beer cans allegedly on the side of the lamestream liberal media.

Who knows, they could be fair, but are they really fair, do they really try to represent different viewpoints, or do they only want to show one side of the coin…

Their side…

I guess you just never know what you might here on that twisted, (allegedly) radio station.


NPR Are they biased?

Is NPR biased, because if they actually are biased in favor of liberal politics, should they be receiving public tax payer funds? This is a hard question, because after watching a few news items about the network that is funded by tax payer dollars, it appears that they have a lot of liberal politics and views, this is somewhat disturbing because at some point we have to ask what if liberal progressive view points some day is deemed as a religion.

You might be able to make the point that they have a very fixed point of view and that they will not change their minds, in fact they could be alleged to be very very biased and even perhaps somewhat allegedly dishonest, in the way they practice their religion.

I mean how do you define a religion, is religion not the worship of a God or God like entity, surely politics could fall into this place, more so when you consider that the view points differ from what we know of actual history.

If this is indeed the case then one might some day make an argument that they should not receive tax payer funds because of the separation of church and state.

Sounds crazy right?

Perhaps not, I mean liberals have used the separation of church and state to cover everything from harvesting peaches, to asking the lords prayer, over lunch.

So why not apply it equally to every single viewpoint that seems to be at times, excessive and biased.

Or would that be just a little over the top, I know one thing, the recent language and comparisons at NPR, were over the top allegedly.

So how about another view, sure why not, that is what America is all about right?

Biased Say it aint so...
Hard to imagine, even harder to watch...