Tag Archives: Bias In The Media

Chris Wallance Biased comments…

We know that many news outlets attempt to present a viable and reliable news presentation, Fox makes much about the fair and balanced approach, however is that really accurate?

Today we watched Chris Wallace make a statement before introducing a video of the George Zimmerman reaction to the verdict.

Bias can take many forms and it has no place in reporting, Chris Wallace should know this but he still used language that was inflammatory, why did he do that?

You see its important to not contribute to some that listen to the news and might do bad things, yet Chris seems to do these things on a regular basis, again why?

As he was introducing the video, he made the statement, that Zimmerman had shot down, Martin, but that was not and still is not true…

It is incorrect to say such a thing and it is wrong, Mr. Wallace Owes America an apology for the biased comment on the national news.

There was no shooting down and to inject bias is wrong on so many levels, Mr. Wallace should be ashamed of himself for making a loaded statement like that.

Do the media have a duty to not incite riots?

Yes, they do and if there were riots, would Mr. Wallace be liable?

Perhaps, he would be held so in a court.

We don’t know but the one thing we do know is that Mr. Wallace is not objective, his statements were wrong and embarrassing.

There seems to be this liberal slant in action when things do not go the way that the media feel that it should be.

There is no place for this type of bias in the media.

Shame on you sir for what you have done.

Again, the false and misleading statement concerning Zimmerman “Shooting Down” Martin is not only Evil but could create violence if left unchecked the media would

be doing this all the time we need to stop and think about what were doing and reporting is not about bias.

 

NBC Town hall She-bate

The Town hall question and answer session, which was allegedly mishandled, in a number of ways, brings about a serious problem in the question of what a debate actually is and why do we have situations where moderators support one candidate over another.

That is a serious problem of bias it is not a question at all it is a problem.

The real question is will advertisers continue to support bias in the media…

 (source)

If Tuesday night’s presidential debate proved nothing else, it demonstrated one thing: CNN’s Candy Crowley is definitely not an “uncommitted voter.” The moderator’s handling of the town-hall debate at Hofstra University was heavy-handed and one-sided throughout, not merely giving more time to President Obama, but repeatedly cutting off Mitt Romney when the Republican attempted to counter accusations from the president.

Reports surfaced days before the Townhall style so called debate that the moderator might detour from the path that both sides felt was less of a role, but many people now wonder what was going on, a moderator is neutral by nature not partisan by design.

What this suggests is media malfeasance.

When you look at the situation and the questions that were asked it is obvious that there were moments when the voters that were represented were not really undecided at all.

What was truly unfair to just about anyone that really matters is the Advertisers.

They supported this travesty of an insult to the intelligence of Americans all over the world.

They may have paid fees and then to have the entire process destroyed by this shrill of a woman, (allegedly)

 Amazing stuff here folks, but will it work are Americans really as stupid as the media appears to be, (allegedly, but what really is interesting here is how this even was so one sided. 

Source, The American Spectator.

At one point, after Obama had repeated his campaign accusation that Romney “said we should let Detroit go bankrupt,” Romney devoted part of his next reponse to rebutting the mischaracterization: “My plan was to have [auto companies] go through bankruptcy like 7-Eleven did and Macy’s and Continental Airlines and come out stronger. And I know he keeps saying, you want to take Detroit bankrupt. Well, the president took Detroit bankrupt. You took General Motors bankrupt. You took Chrysler bankrupt. So when you say that I wanted to take the auto industry bankrupt, you actually did.” The process of bankruptcy was necessary, Romney said, “to get those companies back on their feet, so they could start hiring more people. That was precisely what I recommended and ultimately what happened.”

class warfare the media and bias reporting

What happened to the days of real reporting free of bias?

To tell you the truth I cannot remember when I last saw real reporting designed to bring the news to the consumer of the news.

Why are the media so invested in developing a bias that creates consumer back lash because when you look at this situation from a logical standpoint you have to realize and understand that the Media do not get paid without advertisers, right?

Why would advertisers pay for advertising when the customers they hope to reach out to and sell products to are being treated as if they have no brain and are stupid, what if you stood out in front of your furniture business and yelled at everyone as they were getting out of their cars and said dont come in here your going to be lied to and your going to be ripped off.

What do you think would happen?

Yet Advertisers are being treated badly just as customers are being treated badly.

Bias in the media effects everyone, but first it effects the advertisers, then the consumers, finally the stock holders of the media company that is engaging in poor reporting at the expense of its stock holders.

When you look at this situation you have to wonder what they are doing and why they are doing this.

We have a democratic party that seems bent on a course of action that will divide this nation some are even saying that civil unrest is coming.

With leadership comes responsibility no longer may we allow the views of the minority of people, (less than 2 percent of Americans think like this)

to dictate to everyone how our lives must be lived, we must vote in November we must find a way to get out of the house and vote if you do not have a ride call a friend.

 We must protect our nation against media that act improperly in situations of our freedom and most importantly the freedom of our children to enjoy the same opportunities that we enjoyed…

The media have no right to take our freedom and play games with it as if they own us like slaves.

We are not the slaves of the media any longer.

It is time to vote in November, ignore the lying cowards that the media have become and vote.

Ask you neighbor if they are going to vote they will tell you if they need a ride.

We must stick together because a small percentage of the public are trying to ruin this nation.

Vote in 2012…

Media influence

Is there an Anti Rick Perry Bias in the Media?

Can we continue to allow the media to influence the outcome of elections and call ourselves a democratic society?

   Seems like every single media news company has some bone to pick with Rick Perry, is that fair and balanced?

Media Bias, Media Influence, Media Corruption…

Is the media trying to influence the republican race for the GOP candidate?

The real question should be why is every single media outlet, including Fox news, so allegedly biased against Rick Perry?

Almost every single boggle head, on Fox news, is bashing Perry at every opportunity,

(What happened to fair and balanced coverage?)

Is the news media only interested in fair and balanced when they have not interest in the news story?

Just today Fox news aired a commercial designed to promote a news story about media bias?

In some ways this is really like the kettle calling the pot black because when you consider this issue you have to think about a news company says not what they claim they are saying.  When you see bias on the news and then you see a news story about bias on the news channel that is covering a news story about bias, wow is that confusing or what?

Is the media trying to influence the choice of candidates like they did in the last election where the GOP lost because the wrong man was running for president?  This worked effectively for the Biased news media because they were effectively able to choose the candidate they thought could not win.

This is a problem here in that this is a method of subversion.

This process is a way of unfairly influencing the outcome of what should be a democratic election but has become something else.

Should the news media be allowed to actively participate in the election process as a third party?

In a very real way this is a perversion of the election process, and it really should stop soon because this method of influencing the electorate is wrong.

Media bias is causing a lot of problems and until this process is rejected by the American people and by the Advertisers that support these bias news media companies, we will have a problem that cannot be solved easily.

Until the day that the media stops actively trying to interfere with the democratic process then we are doomed to repeat the failures of the past.

 

Fox news Bias

Should we believe without question what the media publishes.

So what next?

As the 2012 Presidential Race starts to heat up we are seeing a lot of bias by the media…

In the media coverage last night it appeared to some at least that allegedly Chris Wallace, might have had some kind of hidden agenda in his questions, it should not be a surprise to learn that allegedly Chris Wallace likes President Obama, and perhaps allegedly even voted for him.

The real problem is that the man is an alleged coward.

Hiding behind the shield of pretending to be fair and balanced while secretly or not so secretly being engaged in the liberal agenda.

Here is a man who allegedly could not produce a viable book but instead published a cook book that was likely more popular than other publications. 

This is not a problem, because as the old saying goes, if you cant stand the heat write about it instead.

 The thing is that so often you see people like Chris Wallace that appear to try to “project” this fair and balanced news media spin when in their hearts, (allegedly) they are raving and ravening, wolves, seeking to devour the hearts of those that they interview in public.

 

 

Media influence biased

Is the media trying to influence how you think?

Are they trying to influence what you eat?

Is the media attempting to influence every aspect of your life?

Some people are concerned that we no longer have a free media in this nation, perhaps that has been the case for along time now however, before the Internet, knowledge was limited. 

Just like back in the 1950s the average reading age of an American was much lower than it is today when a much larger percentage of the population can now read, knowledge has changed and the way we learn has changed with computers, you can choose the type of knowledge that you are interested in learning.

From websites to ebooks and even portable readers, like the kindle or the ipad, which can carry movies, articles, audio books, and more, however it appears that the media has not factored this into its news coverage and so we see a lot of what must be termed, (allegedly) bias in the media because they hope to try and influence the thoughts of people who are free to do and to think as they want.

That is a serious problem, because when you try to control the freedom of a people you will not find it an easy thing to do, which explains some of the behavior that you so often see on some of the more liberal news companies.

It is frankly disturbing and it is something that should not be even allowed, but that same freedom again is what made this nation great, the media seems to have forgotten where its bread is buttered.

Who do you think supports the media?

If you said Advertisers, you are only half right, the real supporters of the media are the people, because if people stopped buying products that are advertised on media outlets then there would be no need for advertisements.

When the media attempt’s to influence the thoughts of people using keywords and phrases or even subliminal programming or using words and actions of Bobble heads, then you have a conflict of interest.  Advertisers just want people to come and to buy their products, however over time the objective of some news companies has not been advertising but influence.

That is a real problem to the freedom of the press as a whole.

Think about that the next time you buy a product you have seen advertised on a network that thinks less of your than they do the agenda of thought control and influence.  When you have someone whispering in your ear that the sky is purple, over time you will come to believe that the sky is in fact purple, or is that really true at all?  We know that some media companies believe that this is in fact true, that if they tell enough lies, if they tell you the lie, enough times, that you will eventually come to believe it.

The thing is that discounts human will, and that is a strong thing, we know from science and from history those that “think” they know everything often end up lampooned on the petards of their own devices.  It is something to consider simply because over the last four elections there have been numerous attempts by the media to influence the outcome of an election in favor of one political party, in fact we have seen that funding from the public has been used to support some media companies that tend to only present one point of view, now that is not only wrong, but it is against the spirit of the American people.

Yet, we allow it to continue, when a people are pushed too far eventually they will not accept the wants of the lessor power.

We have free will and that is something that no media company can take away.

Judge Bill orielly

Amazing stuff, but did Bill orielly really sit as judge when he knew little or nothing

about this case?

You have to wonder about the situation because this is what is

killing America this Bias in the media.

And it is on both sides, Shame on

Bill orielly for his negative coverage of this trial.