Can anyone win against the media?
Update, It is becoming very clear that Mitt Romney is not able to become president…
In fact if you listen to the media and you actually believe all the trash they shovel on a daily basis, no one can win…
Yes the media continue to give lavish coverage of this man, when it is becoming more obvious than ever….
The media apparently still has not learned that people are not as ignorant as in the past. While it is obvious that there is a small percentage of people that believe everything they are told, that percentage is shrinking and the media have not figured that out yet. This will make you laugh, so be prepared to grin at how the media view you. The Media tries to use reverse psychology on you, by pushing certain candidates that cannot win (and they know it) So who is on this list, well the top person who should allegedly be on this Cant win list is.
1. newt gingrich
2. ron paul
3. rudy giuliani
4. mike huckabee
5. Mitt Romney
6. Tim Pawlenty
7. Jon Huntsman,
Former U.S. Ambassador to China
Jon may talk a good political game, but sadly, he cannot win, just look at the mess we are in with China right now?
Do you want that kind of mess for every nation on the face of the planet, then vote for Jon,
if you want real hope and change, then vote for anyone else.
The Media tries to use double reverse Psychology, by pretending to push certain candidates while hoping those candidates will not run. The Media seems to be involved in a lot of what is called politics, they are like the troll living under the bridge waiting for an unsuspecting pilgrim to wander across the bridge. I know its sort of odd to see this type of thing, because in the past the Media has tried to create this idea that they are your friends, and in the past perhaps that was true, with the baby boomer generation and the days when TV went off after 10 PM at night, those days are gone forever, but it is really ignorant to consider that along with all those changes that the audience, the consumers, the customers, the clients have not changed?
The thing is we have changed simply because we no longer are entirely dependent upon the media for our news. We can get multiple news sources from multiple places, all over the world, we are no longer limited to the 5PM news story and that my friends is a very good thing when you begin to look at the way that the media has tried to influence not only the outcome of elections but also public opinions by using psychology and keywords they try to intimidate the public into believing what they think we should believe, it was a powerful plan of action back in the 1970s but today, thirty year in the past, that idea is just not working any more. No longer are we subject to simply tricks of psychology, we have evolved beyond that type of intimidation so the media is slowing trying to figure out how they can change their stripes, but can they really do what they think they can do, influence the outcome of elections and more importantly should they be doing that at all. The problem is that people are just not that stupid if we ever were and what is even more interesting is the very real fact that with out consumers, no advertisers would ever pay a fee to advertise on a broken media outlet, so really who is smarter now?